Currency Wars is a very popular book in China. It’s author, Song Hongbing, has tapped into a rich vein of nationalism and suspicion about the West, especially the role of US investment banks.
His argument, which is entirely specious, is that a cabal of investment bankers have dictated the course of world history since the Napoleonic wars, are the gatekeepers to the US presidency, and - should they be allowed into the Chinese economy - would bring the current benign social order crashing down to serve their own evil interests.
I discussed this book with a Chinese friend who works in the financial sector and he said that its popularity was an interesting social phenomenon. But the author was so obviously a crazy conspiracy theorist that his work had no influence at all in policy or finance circles.
Finance graduates might be able to see through the smoke and mirrors, but the book had a major influence on public opinion, and a follow up - imaginatively entitled ‘Currency Wars II’ - has just hit the book stores.
This is my translation of the main points from a chapter in the first Currency Wars, focusing on the potential evils of allowing foreign investment banks into the Chinese economy, and the benefits of returning to gold as the basis of the international financial system:
‘Control of money supply is key to control of the economy. You might think that foreign banks have no way of influencing the money supply in China, that the People’s Bank of China controls the supply of money. In fact, by issuing loans, banks influence the money supply. Let foreign banks into China, and they would deliberately manipulate the money supply, using excess supply to cause inflation, and restricting supply to cause deflation, crippling the economy, as they have done to destabilize foreign countries throughout history.
The US is already using its influence to disrupt China’s money supply. By manipulating its trade deficit with China, the US can increase the money supply in China, and that can lead to bubbles in the property sector and equity markets. China’s Central Bank can only control the problem by selling bonds to soak up the additions to the money supply, but this increases the national debt.
These are the currency wars, and as long as the US dollar is the main international currency, China has no way to fight back. Only when gold again becomes the basis of the international currency system can we have an independent, fair, and harmonious financial system.’
Of course, there is a kernel of truth in all this. Hedge funds, many of them US hedge funds, were instrumental in destabilising Asian economies in the Asian Financial Crisis. China’s trade surplus, combined with the fixed exchange rate, does cause problems for the People’s Bank of China. The role of the US dollar in the international financial system is beneficial to the US and harmful to its creditors.
But the way all of these facts is put together is completely wrong. It’s not foreign banks who are creating a problem in China’s money supply, it is domestic banks. It’s not the US that is forcing China to run a trade surplus with a fixed exchange rate - it’s a deliberate part of China’s development policy. And a US dollar based international financial system might have its flaws, but the world moved away from the gold standard for a reason - because it tied money supply to the availability of a scarce commodity - and a return is not on anyone apart from Song Hongbing’s agenda.
Banking, Exchange rate, International Relations, Monetary Policy, Trade, US-China Relations